Blame the Victim Rules the Subprime Debacle

Posted by D.D.Grant at 2:04 AM

Anyone get the impression as I do that the scene is being set for placing the blame for the economic crisis on those hapless people who were so inconsiderate as to put everyone at risk by actually taking advantage of what they saw as the opportunity to get their piece of the pie? Yes folks, the reason the wheels of high finance are now gumming up is you or your neighbours utter selfishness in wanting a decent roof over the heads of your families. How thoughtless and unpatriotic of you to throw caution to the wind.

Max Wolff notes the mindlessness that has become a feature of commentary on the financial crisis where mouthing "subprime" a sufficient number of times seems to absolve anyone from actual analysis. The following from Credit Backwash August 21, 2007

"Every day we watch people blame sub-prime. Sub-prime is neither contained nor, is it the essence of present trouble. Discussing sub-prime as the cause of asset re-pricing has become ubiquitous. I would liken this line of explanation to the way that American urban violence is often discussed as "gang related" or "drug related". In short, it is a lazy catch all employed to avoid scratching below the surface. ..."

The truth is it seems that it's not only in the housing mortgage sector that 'liar loans' have been the fashion.

"A huge credit bubble exists and extends far beyond sub prime mortgage distress. The global bubble is enormous and has many sub-component bubblettes. The internationalization, integration and expansion of finance extended and distributed the effects of overly cheap and easy credit. Innovation of new products, thin opaque markets in credit vehicles and voracious appetite for leveraged yield have transformed balance sheets and portfolios. This mountain of gas soaked rags was ignited by the credit concerns in sub prime. Now the credit bubble is burning. Years of euphoria, easy money and asset inflations built to dizzying heights. Massive, cheap and easy debt was taken on to buy houses, currencies, bonds, equities, mortgages, leveraged loans, credit default swaps, real goods and services. Credit burdens were taken lightly, rolled over, bundled and sold. As long as lenders, buyers, ratings agencies and faith held, bubbles formed and swelled. The size, volatility and interconnectedness of international asset inflation was unprecedented. The downturn has been similarly correlated. Sub-prime credits and the collateralized mortgage obligations comprised of them deflated- the match was struck. The fire is never really caused simply or exclusively by the match that lights it.

All these innovative new mortgages were written because there was great money to be made in bundling them into mortgage backed securities (MBS) and collateralized mortgage obligations (CMO). Lenders cashed in on a "originated to distribute" bonanza. All types of finance companies wrote mortgages- and many other types of credit contracts - only to sell them off. A popular final destination was in collateralized obligations. This industry swelled as trillions of dollars in mortgages were written over the past few years. Every obstacle to further lending was innovated around to allow profits to continue to flow. The risks of all this lending were less pressing as mortgages loans were made to be sold- not held. All the available credit bid up house prices and led to the false conclusion that houses were always safe, appreciating assets. Questionable loans and sub-prime mortgages were sold and reconfigured into AAA rated product. Risk vanished from consideration and discussion. Transformed mortgages became credit vehicles and were sold all over the world. Part of the mad dash now involves finding these hidden gems hiding on books and ascertaining their real value."

Meanwhile over at the Pundit's Blog Brent Budowsky tells it to America straight: Gilded Age Crime: Poor Go Homeless, Wealthy Get Bailouts

"Is it right that the new racket on Wall Street is that banks make bad loans, sell them to hedge funds and private equity firms, many of whom are virtually unregulated and untaxed, who then complain about their pain after they foreclose on average Americans for falling a little behind their payments?

It is good that today the Fed cut the prime by 50 points, but it is bad, and terribly wrong and unjust, that in the last week the Fed has essentially used Americans' money to bail out the wealthy who made the profits, while doing zero for the foreclosed and homeless.

When the banks, hedge funds and private equity firms make bad deals, they keep the personal profits, while the corporate profits are protected by bailouts. Meanwhile, when the average Americans in the middle class, or the poor, fall a little behind, they get the boot, they lose their jobs, they are thrown into the street without homes and often without food."

And don't ya just love the reasoning on RESPONSIBILITY that goes with the line of argument that runs, subprime borrowers who made bad decisions based on insufficient knowledge of what they were getting into should BE HELD RESPONSIBLE for those decisions even if this means losing their homes. Who cares if they're on the streets since that won't affect the economy. All they do is produce products services. But investors who made bad decisions based on insufficient knowledge of the real values of their investments should .... NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE for their decisions and should be bailed out by the taxpayer. They must at all costs be protected from losses. Their coupon clipping and 'premia' are essential to the economy.

I think this is known as one law for the rich and another for the poor.

Betting the Bank, and then some.....

Posted by D.D.Grant at 10:49 PM

Who hasn't heard stories of inveterate betting men fully alert to the essential truth that everything in life is a wager. It's chilling to think that the progress of the subprime bubble may well depend on the progress of two flies on a window pane, but let's not forget the idea attributed to chaos theory of the connection between the flapping of butterfly wings and the tornado that topples an economy. (A fascinating area in which to see the dissipation of risk based on essentially the same notion is the apparently mundane world of Insurance and Re-Insurance where the losses from disasters are spread in a worldwide market. Mundane until it's recalled that the men in the London coffee-houses were themselves no stiffs when it came to a bet).

The wild frenzy of gambling that now grips the world is not only attested to by the 54 million casino visits made by Americans in 2004 to lose more than $78 billion on the turn of a card or the spinning the slots, in effect sophisticated mechanical flies. James Mackintosh in The unbearable obscurity of exotic hedge funds gives a truly hair-raising listing of the current trend in hedge fund products. These make the sorties into housing speculation of the American homeowner positively parochial. You start to get the flavor of the 'New Economy' on learning from Mackintosh, "As hedge funds move into the mainstream, managers are testing demand for ever-more exotic investments - and finding backers willing to stump up millions of dollars for funds putting cash into everything from football players, wine and art to aircraft leasing and carbon credits."

A telling clue to the unease of large investors in the plain old vanilla securities market can be had from the tendency of big institutions to ensure that their fortunes "will not move in line with shares, bonds and other traditional investments." Following on this in the recent period money has flowed to a range of 'exotic' funds. These include football funds that buy the rights to talented young players in the hope of profiting from transfer fees should these achieve star status; instead of boring old charts investors must assess the risks of injury, drug abuse etc. (American Idol Fund anyone?). Others include fund specialising in sugar, film financing, art and wine.

Ominously, given the level of consumer debt, there are also funds investing in defaulted credit card debts and partnering with collection agencies in recovering the debt. This in an era when some credit card debt carries interest approaching 30% and when the UK for example is beset with problems stemming from the practices of doorstep consumer loan companies. There was a time when this kind of debt was purely a 'family' affair. Perhaps these developments lend a new meaning to the expression 'gangster-capitalism.'

Enter the multiplier, never far behind. Not to be outdone, Orthogonal Partners is launching a fund dedicated to - investing in exotic hedge funds. "There is a wall of money chasing every opportunity in the alternative scene so you really want to be targeting new niches where you still have a scarcity of capital and inefficiencies that can be exploited," says Dan Gore, Orthogonal's co-founder.

A staid voice intrudes; 'Tracy Pearson, head of alternatives at London fund of hedge funds Forsyth Partners, says it is questionable how many of the exotic funds are really hedged. "If it is offshore and they can charge 2 [per cent a year] and 20 [per cent of profits] it is a hedge fund," she says. "We get all sorts of stuff, usually sent from a Yahoo e-mail account."'

Any day now I expect offers from Nigeria to arrive in my inbox; they may even be packaged with the scams offering to make me an instant multi-millionaire in exchange for help with repatriating the fortunes of some hapless tyrant. Hey, I just thought of a great hedge fund idea.

Speculation and The Housing Bubble

Posted by D.D.Grant at 11:32 PM

Most of us have, or at least think we have, a pretty good idea of what speculation means when applied to the stock market. Financial advisers will give us various rules the first among which is to speculate only with money the loss of which won't be a catastrophe for your portfolio and assets in general. But what form does speculation take in the housing market?

At first glance we think we know the answer to this too. It's obvious in the statistics after all. Just look at the sales in the non-owner-occupied category and there you have it. Formally, in other words, we think of speculative buying in the housing market as involving those units bought by investors, either with an eye to the fastest possible capital gain in a rising market, or for the rental market with the same ultimate intention of realizing a capital gain through resale.

It is not usually the case that a property bought for owner occupation is considered a speculative purchase. However, in the period of a bubble such as the present subprime bubble, (actually, as we are daily learning, it's a general housing bubble), it can be said that in fact a proportion of owner occupier buys have a greater or lesser speculative component. This will have a tendency to be amplified in the course of the bubble. The main indicator of whether this speculative component is present will be to whatever extent the buying decision is being made on the basis of the profits to be had from a rapidly rising market. Anyone with a home that serves current needs perfectly well and even has a substantial percentage of equity built up who then sells with a view to cashing out this equity and leveraging it into a more expensive home is speculating. Worse still, they are speculating against the advice of the staid investment advisor mentioned earlier. For who can afford to lose a home should the speculation not pan out without it being a catastrophe? The position is no different in essence to that of someone stricken with margin madness in a stock market bubble. And the consequences when the bubble bursts are likely to be the same: the margin call that cannot be met from evaporating gains or the mortgage adjustment that cannot be met from increased equity.

Unfortunately, a whole fairytale about the home being the "biggest investment you will make in life" has taken hold almost universally in the last few decades. This idiotic idea may be wonderful copy for the Realty world but it is disastrous for the homeowner. And it is especially disastrous for those homeowners who could have traded down and thereby could now have cash in hand ready to take advantage of the coming bargains at the bottom of the cycle.

Read twice: Don't speculate with an asset the loss of which would be a catastrophe.